“an iPhone tax”
Farhad Manjoo’s Slate piece on Apple’s looming e-book crackdown is brilliant - http://www.slate.com/id/2283381/ #apple #kindle
==============
from the Slate piece …
“… since Apple takes a 30 percent cut for purchases made from inside apps, pushing people outside the app is a way to bypass what’s essentially an iPhone tax. … I’m hoping Amazon responds to Apple’s restriction by voluntarily pulling the Kindle app from the App Store. In its place, Amazon should create a Kindle reader for the mobile Web—a fully functional e-book app that Apple couldn’t meddle with.”
Or maybe things can go the other way. When I use my iPhone to call a pizza place, it seems only fair that Apple should get 30 percent of the cost of whatever pizzas I order and 30 percent of whatever I tip the delivery guy.
Apple and Amazon must not comprehend the effect that grabby fights like these have on customers. Imagine a shop where the merchant and the landlord squabble openly over each penny that comes in the door. You’d stay away. And with e-books, you can afford to stay away. The Age of Innocence, which I savored as much as any e-book I’ve purchased for my Kindle, is old enough to be available as a free, legal download from Project Gutenberg. Here’s a list of the top 100 Gutenberg books people downloaded yesterday.
It is at this point that I would need to mumble some shabby excuse about why it’s still OK for me to get The New Yorker on my Kindle. Um, slow reader. Um, text-to-speech. Um, never once got through the whole print edition in all the years I subscribed. Um, it’s how I was able to blog this and this and this. Um. Um. Um. That’s all I’ve got.
Thanks to Hal Espen for linking to the Slate piece. Espen, if you’re in the market, can provide you with sentences like this one: “His primary bête noire is anything he deems postmodernist, and he beats on it like Camille Paglia humping a Madonna mannequin.”
I just added his RSS to my Google Reader.
- David Quigg, 2/4/11







